Marlon Vankan vs Cezar Cretu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Apr at 07:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Vankan vs C. Cretu

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Vankan 1 - 0 Cretu
They have played 3 sets in total, with Marlon Vankan winning 2 and Cezar Cretu winning 1. The last match between Marlon Vankan and Cezar Cretu was at the M25 Antalya, 09-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Marlon Vankan getting the victory 7-5 1-6 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Vankan | 1 |
Cretu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Antalya(04-09-25)
M. Vankan vs C. Cretu H2H Profile
M. Vankan vs C. Cretu Match Preview:
How critical is the second serve performance when determining a match's outcome? Over the past six months, Cretu and Vankan have both secured 0% of points on their second serve. This staggering statistic highlights an intriguing parallel. How does this factor into the prediction accuracy? Naturally, it nudges us toward some compelling insights—the ability to capitalize on the second serve is undeniably a game-changer, yet neither player has shown prowess in this area recently.
What about their return game? Neither Cretu nor Vankan has managed to claim a point from their opponent's second serve in recent outings. Even their first serve returns yield a matchless 0% success rate. Such uniform results might make one wonder—how do these figures influence our perception of their head-to-head matchup? Even before the action unfolds, the return game stats seem to predict an evenly matched contest.
Let's consider their performance when under pressure. Cretu and Vankan both stand at 0% in terms of breakpoint saves. Is this a significant marker for in-game betting predictions? Absolutely. It whispers of vulnerability and missed opportunities, laying the foundation for predictions that cannot be overlooked. Their inability to avert danger scenarios mirrors consistently across other statistical domains.
And so, examining the broader view—the performance overview over the past year tells the same story: Cretu and Vankan have each won 0% of their matches (with a record of 0/0). Notably, their encounters have been against opponents of varying calibre, though the average ranking remains undisclosed. How does this variance affect their predictability? It potentially amplifies unpredictability, suggesting their readiness against diverse playing styles is yet unproven.
For those keen on the prediction of live outcomes during a deciding set, both Cretu and Vankan remain untested, with neither securing a victory in deciding sets over the last 12 months. This singular fact casts a shadow of doubt about their endurance and acumen in high-stakes scenarios. When seizing breakpoint opportunities, both players once again present a 0% conversion rate—a crucial tidbit for anyone interested in live betting.
Ultimately, what is the prediction for this match outcome based on these cold-hard stats? The numbers tell a tale of equilibrium, where neither has demonstrated a competitive edge over the other. If past performance is any guide, Cretu and Vankan might be locked into a match where opportunities, should they arise, might tip the scale. Yet, given the sheer uniformity of their stats, a draw in capability leaves the outcome open-ended, dependent on who can break the statistical stasis and defy the odds.
Marlon Vankan vs Cezar Cretu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Vankan vs C. Cretu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
14 | Games Won | 13 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
2:21:14 | Average Match Time | 2:21:14 |
67% (63/94) | 1st Serve % | 75% (66/88) |
67% (42/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (40/66) |
35% (11/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (6/22) |
63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) |
48% (42/88) | Return Points Win % | 44% (41/94) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Vankan Recent Matches Played
C. Cretu Recent Matches Played

M. Vankan vs C. Cretu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
53.99% (176/150) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.24% (290/135) |
53.54% (393/341) | Sets Win/Loss | 64.05% (613/344) |
51.15% (3478/3321) | Games Win/Loss | 55.42% (4941/3974) |
34.62% (9/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (36/24) |
56.40% (163/126) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.72% (251/109) |
36.36% (4/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
331 | Aces Total | 771 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
581 | Total Double Faults | 853 |
1:14:17 | Average Match Time | 1:25:51 |
370.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 463.9 |
66% (10449/15807) | 1st Serve % | 64% (14776/23018) |
62% (6501/10449) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9712/14776) |
48% (2588/5358) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4118/8242) |
44% (739/1683) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1286/2753) |
41% (6505/15710) | Return Points Win % | 44% (10324/23419) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (4/0) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
40.00% (4/6) | Challenger W/L | 53.13% (34/30) |
54.43% (172/144) | Futures W/L | 70.99% (252/103) |
54% (174/321) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (282/416) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
53% (32/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (50/95) |
51% (43/85) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (76/118) |
89% (171/152) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (267/247) |
11% (171/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (267/20) |
15% (155/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (156/41) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
